Republicans/conservatives/people who don’t agree with abortion have always been accused of being anti-womens’ rights.
The PJ Tatler has a good story that shows why anti-gun liberals are actually the ones who are attempting to restrict the rights of women. And not on something like the right to abort the child in their body, but the very right to survive an attack by a criminal and continue to live their life.
”…Colorado state Sen. Evie Hudak who, at a hearing on banning concealed carry on college campuses, told rape survivor Amanda Collins that having a gun would not have done her any good. Collins had just shared her story of survival. Democrat Hudak berated her in response.
‘I just want to say, statistics are not on your side, even if you had had a gun. You said that you were a martial arts student, I mean person, experience in taekwondo, and yet because this individual was so large and was able to overcome you even with your skills, and chances are that if you had had a gun, then he would have been able to get than from you and possibly use it against you …’”
So here’s another example of a government-knows-and-solves-it-all liberal who is telling a woman that she should just forget about having a gun to protect herself and just trust him that it wouldn’t help anyway. I’m not sure what he personally recommends she use for protection in the case of an attack, but honestly what does it matter? I highly doubt that he actually had a concern for her safety, he appears to just have been pissed off that someone attempted to present a legitimate use for a law-abiding citizen owning a gun.